Why Teaching Intellingent Design and Creationism in...

As a parent of a student that attends this school system, I would like to take the time to explain to you why I do not believe that incorporating intelligent design and creationism into the curriculum in our schools is a good idea, nor one that will further the intelligence of our kids but will rather, waste their time and leave them ill prepared for their futures in a university setting where the only thing that is taught is the valid truth of the Theory of Evolution. As many people already are aware, there are many disagreements as to why evolution is not true and should not be taught to students in our schools. Most of these arguments stem from nothing but pure ignorance on the part of the person arguing for intelligent design to be†¦show more content†¦If the enthusiasts of intelligent design and creationism actually had knowledge of the way they science and the scientific method functioned, I don’t believe they would be so quick to wish for their views on the subject and their theories to be put alongside the Theory of Evolution, which has been proven to stand the test of time. For as long as Charles Darwin’s theory has been tested, which is over one hundred and fifty years, I can certainly say that I will not require that length of time to pick apart intelligent design. In fact, I’m sure I can explain it fully by the time I have finished this paper. The point that I am about to prove is how to identify and fully discredit a theory that has absolutely no scientific basis whatsoever. Teaching our children to dismantle these theories and to ask questions themselves is just as important lesson as the original lesson that was being taught. Not knowing how to properly do this is the main reason that people tend to accept, grab on to and cling to these ancient theories that have been debunked time and time again. It all boils down to ignorance. A quick lesson on intelligent design for the people who are not familiar with the theory: Intelligent design followers think that there are gaps in the theory of evolution. They accuse that scientists have not been able to fill each and every gap and answer every